HYMB vs. ANGL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL).
HYMB and ANGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYMB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Municipal Yield. It was launched on Apr 13, 2011. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. Both HYMB and ANGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HYMB or ANGL.
Key characteristics
| HYMB | ANGL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.77% | 6.47% |
| 1Y Return | 11.68% | 12.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.21% | 0.77% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.03% | 5.09% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.93% | 6.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.24 | 2.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.11 | 4.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | 1.28 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.66 | 17.94 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.84% | 0.74% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.53% | 5.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.57% | -35.07% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.91% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMB and ANGL is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HYMB vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 6.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HYMB has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 2.93%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYMB vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HYMB and ANGL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HYMB vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HYMB vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than ANGL's 6.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.24% | 4.06% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% | 4.49% | 5.17% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.07% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
HYMB vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -35.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and ANGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HYMB vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.25%. This indicates that HYMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.