PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLS vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLS vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLS achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 9.51% return.


HYLS

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.59%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
4.44%

RYLD

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.51%
6M
8.37%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLS vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
0.43%8.00%5.85%13.66%-12.83%3.69%5.32%5.05%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
9.51%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLS and RYLD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.54

The correlation between HYLS and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLS vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLS
HYLS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HYLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLS vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYLSRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

3.31

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

13.37

-6.91

HYLS vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLS and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYLS vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLSRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-41.53%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-6.29%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

-19.05%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.75%

-21.33%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.50%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-8.78%

+6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.55%

-0.82%

Volatility

HYLS vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) is 0.85%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that HYLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLSRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

2.00%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

7.80%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

10.66%

-7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

14.05%

-7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

17.15%

-10.45%

HYLS vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLS vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than RYLD's 11.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
6.69%6.38%6.25%5.98%7.38%5.48%5.09%5.17%5.81%5.53%5.37%6.11%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.73%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLS and RYLD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYLD has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to HYLS (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLS dropped -22.99% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

On 5-year performance, HYLS leads with 2.88% vs 2.45% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HYLS has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYLS has performed better with a 2.88% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for HYLS.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 6.69% for HYLS.

HYLS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RYLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for HYLS and 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLS and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer