PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLS vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLS vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HYLS has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 4.35%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.


HYLS

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.70%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
4.35%

AGG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.09%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLS vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
0.28%8.00%5.85%13.66%-12.83%3.69%5.32%14.66%-2.46%6.39%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.25%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%0.09%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLS and AGG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013

0.21

Over the past year, HYLS and AGG have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLS vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLS
HYLS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HYLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLS vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYLSAGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

1.34

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

2.00

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.87

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.42

5.73

+1.69

HYLS vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLS and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYLSAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.34

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.02

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.29

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.59

+0.09

Drawdowns

HYLS vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLSAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

-18.43%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-2.76%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

-6.11%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.75%

-17.82%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

-18.43%

-4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-2.14%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-2.71%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.90%

-0.17%

Volatility

HYLS vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) is 1.16%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that HYLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLSAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

1.30%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

2.74%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

3.85%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

6.09%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

5.40%

+1.30%

HYLS vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLS vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than AGG's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.99%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
6.70%6.38%6.25%5.98%7.38%5.48%5.09%5.17%5.81%5.53%5.37%6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLS and AGG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGG has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to HYLS (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYLS dropped -22.99% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 10-year performance, HYLS leads with 4.35% vs 1.57% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HYLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYLS has performed better with a 4.35% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for HYLS.

HYLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 3.99% for AGG.

HYLS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for HYLS and 0.03% for AGG.

HYLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLS and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer