HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO).
HYLD.TO and QQC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYLD.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Feb 4, 2022. QQC.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 27, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HYLD.TO or QQC.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between HYLD.TO and QQC.TO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HYLD.TO:
1.67
QQC.TO:
1.81
HYLD.TO:
2.26
QQC.TO:
2.43
HYLD.TO:
1.30
QQC.TO:
1.32
HYLD.TO:
2.46
QQC.TO:
2.54
HYLD.TO:
10.47
QQC.TO:
8.94
HYLD.TO:
2.46%
QQC.TO:
3.64%
HYLD.TO:
15.41%
QQC.TO:
17.96%
HYLD.TO:
-31.38%
QQC.TO:
-31.81%
HYLD.TO:
-0.60%
QQC.TO:
-0.64%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYLD.TO achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly higher than QQC.TO's 3.88% return.
HYLD.TO
4.46%
0.51%
10.37%
25.80%
N/A
N/A
QQC.TO
3.88%
1.42%
18.38%
33.22%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLD.TO has a 2.37% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HYLD.TO
QQC.TO
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HYLD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.88%, more than QQC.TO's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF | 11.88% | 12.13% | 12.11% | 13.02% | 0.00% |
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, roughly equal to the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLD.TO and QQC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HYLD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (HYLD.TO) is 3.59%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that HYLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.