HYDB vs. PGHY
HYDB (iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF) and PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYDB tracks the BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index while PGHY tracks the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYDB returned 4.69%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for PGHY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
HYDB vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDB achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than PGHY's 2.59% return.
HYDB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- —
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
HYDB vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDB iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF | 1.43% | 8.10% | 9.11% | 14.02% | -9.99% | 5.14% | 7.39% | 16.13% | -3.18% | 3.38% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.59% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 3.04% | 5.87% | 0.38% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDB and PGHY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017 | 0.42 |
The correlation between HYDB and PGHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDB vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank
HYDB
PGHY
HYDB vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDB | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.59 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 10.06 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDB | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.57 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.85 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.61 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
HYDB vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than PGHY's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and PGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDB | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.58% | -20.50% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -3.04% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.58% | -5.03% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | -9.42% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.40% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -1.64% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 0.78% | -0.14% |
Volatility
HYDB vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) is 1.12%, while Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that HYDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDB | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.88% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 3.66% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 5.01% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 5.44% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 7.04% | +0.72% |
HYDB vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HYDB and PGHY have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
HYDB vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison
HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than PGHY's 7.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDB iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF | 7.00% | 7.04% | 6.95% | 7.00% | 6.30% | 4.70% | 5.81% | 5.68% | 6.16% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.08% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDB and PGHY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGHY has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to HYDB (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDB dropped -21.58% vs PGHY's -20.50%.
On 5-year performance, HYDB leads with 4.69% vs 4.61% for PGHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, HYDB has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYDB has performed better with a 4.69% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYDB and PGHY have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 7.00% for HYDB.
HYDB tracks BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index, while PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
HYDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDB and PGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer