PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HY vs. TM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HY vs. TM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HY achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -15.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HY has underperformed TM with an annualized return of -2.72%, while TM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.55% annualized return.


HY

1D
-1.90%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
22.33%
6M
5.65%
1Y
-10.12%
3Y*
-8.77%
5Y*
-10.97%
10Y*
-2.72%

TM

1D
-0.15%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-15.81%
6M
-7.79%
1Y
-4.45%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HY vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
22.33%-39.45%-16.27%153.37%-35.94%-29.47%3.87%-2.66%-25.91%35.83%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
-15.81%13.82%8.88%38.23%-24.43%23.21%13.62%22.69%-5.81%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HY and TM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2012

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HY:

$635.14M

TM:

$234.89B

EPS

HY:

-$5.59

TM:

$2.98K

PS Ratio

HY:

0.17

TM:

0.00

PB Ratio

HY:

1.48

TM:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

HY:

$3.65B

TM:

$51.16T

Gross Profit (TTM)

HY:

$580.60M

TM:

$8.54T

EBITDA (TTM)

HY:

-$200.00K

TM:

$7.11T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HY vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HY
HY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TM
TM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HY vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.00

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

-0.16

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

-0.42

-0.13

HY vs. TM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HY Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the TM Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HY and TM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

-0.15

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.09

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.36

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.31

-0.27

Drawdowns

HY vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HY drawdown since its inception was -77.61%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HY and TM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.61%

-60.15%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.95%

-27.42%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.38%

-34.92%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.62%

-36.80%

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.61%

-36.80%

-40.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.87%

-27.42%

-30.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.59%

-20.99%

-16.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.41%

10.75%

+7.66%

Volatility

HY vs. TM - Volatility Comparison

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) has a higher volatility of 16.90% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 8.10%. This indicates that HY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.90%

8.10%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.58%

20.34%

+17.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.32%

29.19%

+18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.96%

26.90%

+21.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.34%

23.63%

+22.71%

Dividends

HY vs. TM - Dividend Comparison

HY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than TM's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
4.05%4.81%2.70%2.09%5.10%3.13%2.13%2.14%1.99%1.41%1.83%2.15%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
1.59%2.95%2.81%2.45%2.90%2.45%2.74%1.30%3.40%2.96%3.23%5.59%

Financials

HY vs. TM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00T14.00T20222023202420252026
795.20M
12.83T
(HY) Total Revenue
(TM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HY vs. TM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
15.7%
15.1%
Portfolio components
HY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. reported a gross profit of 124.80M and revenue of 795.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.7%.

TM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

HY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. reported an operating income of -28.00M and revenue of 795.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

TM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

HY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. reported a net income of -30.50M and revenue of 795.20M, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.

TM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HY and TM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HY has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to TM (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HY dropped -77.61% vs TM's -60.15%.

TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HY and TM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer