HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO).
HXT.TO and XFN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HXT.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2010. XFN.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2001. Both HXT.TO and XFN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HXT.TO or XFN.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between HXT.TO and XFN.TO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HXT.TO:
2.52
XFN.TO:
3.05
HXT.TO:
3.51
XFN.TO:
4.04
HXT.TO:
1.46
XFN.TO:
1.58
HXT.TO:
5.15
XFN.TO:
5.31
HXT.TO:
15.23
XFN.TO:
17.97
HXT.TO:
1.66%
XFN.TO:
1.76%
HXT.TO:
10.04%
XFN.TO:
10.37%
HXT.TO:
-35.48%
XFN.TO:
-56.55%
HXT.TO:
-1.50%
XFN.TO:
-1.90%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly higher than XFN.TO's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HXT.TO has underperformed XFN.TO with an annualized return of 9.03%, while XFN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.
HXT.TO
3.64%
2.04%
12.17%
23.19%
11.01%
9.03%
XFN.TO
1.35%
0.26%
18.02%
29.37%
11.67%
10.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXT.TO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XFN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HXT.TO
XFN.TO
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XFN.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF | 3.05% | 3.16% | 3.60% | 3.48% | 2.67% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.43% | 2.73% | 2.83% | 3.17% | 2.95% |
Drawdowns
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum XFN.TO drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and XFN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HXT.TO vs. XFN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) at 2.62%. This indicates that HXT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.