HUT vs. BTCS
HUT (Hut 8 Corp.) and BTCS (BTCS Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, HUT returned 35.40%/yr vs -28.24%/yr for BTCS. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HUT vs. BTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUT achieves a 134.28% return, which is significantly higher than BTCS's -60.98% return.
HUT
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 92.78%
- YTD
- 134.28%
- 1Y
- 444.14%
- 3Y*
- 85.18%
- 5Y*
- 35.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.81%
BTCS
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -54.02%
- YTD
- -60.98%
- 1Y
- -74.35%
- 3Y*
- -3.80%
- 5Y*
- -28.24%
- 10Y*
- -25.40%
- ALL TIME*
- -55.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCS BTCS Inc. | $512.94K | $650.91K | $1.23M |
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | $525.36M | $446.23M | $513.46M |
HUT vs. BTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | 134.28% | 124.21% | 53.60% | 213.88% | -89.17% | 185.45% | 250.63% | -25.02% | -70.80% |
BTCS BTCS Inc. | -60.98% | 8.08% | 51.53% | 158.73% | -79.65% | 65.26% | 179.41% | -85.38% | -81.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUT and BTCS is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between HUT and BTCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
HUT:
$12.12B
BTCS:
$51.27M
HUT:
-$2.77
BTCS:
-$1.76
HUT:
8.66
BTCS:
0.71
HUT:
-$40.96M
BTCS:
$16.95M
HUT:
-$132.19M
BTCS:
$2.90M
HUT:
-$306.16M
BTCS:
-$65.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUT vs. BTCS — Risk / Return Rank
HUT
BTCS
HUT vs. BTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and BTCS Inc. (BTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUT | BTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.81 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.62 | -0.93 | +11.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.07 | -1.31 | +27.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUT vs. BTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUT drawdown since its inception was -95.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT and BTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUT | BTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.04% | -100.00% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.62% | -83.55% | +44.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.08% | -84.91% | +19.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.04% | -92.94% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.09% | -100.00% | +80.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.83% | -97.70% | +34.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | 58.72% | -43.01% |
Volatility
HUT vs. BTCS - Volatility Comparison
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) has a higher volatility of 37.29% compared to BTCS Inc. (BTCS) at 17.37%. This indicates that HUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUT | BTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.29% | 17.37% | +19.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.96% | 58.90% | +18.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.84% | 85.76% | +22.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.81% | 125.37% | -19.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.67% | 189.78% | -75.11% |
Dividends
HUT vs. BTCS - Dividend Comparison
HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCS BTCS Inc. | 4.85% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.94% |
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HUT vs. BTCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hut 8 Corp. and BTCS Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HUT and BTCS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUT has higher volatility (37.29%) compared to BTCS (17.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUT dropped -95.04% vs BTCS's -100.00%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUT and BTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer