PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HUT.TOGLXY.TO
YTD Return96.38%143.85%
1Y Return180.00%249.86%
3Y Return (Ann)-28.77%-15.01%
5Y Return (Ann)33.84%86.70%
Sharpe Ratio1.312.96
Sortino Ratio2.213.20
Omega Ratio1.251.38
Calmar Ratio1.632.98
Martin Ratio3.6216.51
Ulcer Index41.15%14.99%
Daily Std Dev113.49%83.62%
Max Drawdown-94.44%-91.88%
Current Drawdown-64.93%-40.91%

Fundamentals


HUT.TOGLXY.TO
Market CapCA$3.20BCA$8.84B
EPS-CA$1.09CA$4.55
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$122.76MCA$280.46M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$32.68MCA$173.15M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$6.70MCA$19.65M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between HUT.TO and GLXY.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HUT.TO achieves a 96.38% return, which is significantly lower than GLXY.TO's 143.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
181.70%
86.62%
HUT.TO
GLXY.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO) and Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUT.TO, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.47
GLXY.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLXY.TO, currently valued at 15.88, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.88

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the GLXY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUT.TO and GLXY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.27
2.87
HUT.TO
GLXY.TO

Dividends

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUT.TO nor GLXY.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, roughly equal to the maximum GLXY.TO drawdown of -91.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUT.TO and GLXY.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-68.82%
-47.08%
HUT.TO
GLXY.TO

Volatility

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hut 8 Mining Corp. (HUT.TO) has a higher volatility of 35.85% compared to Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. (GLXY.TO) at 33.61%. This indicates that HUT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLXY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
35.85%
33.61%
HUT.TO
GLXY.TO

Financials

HUT.TO vs. GLXY.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hut 8 Mining Corp. and Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items