PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUN vs. OLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUN vs. OLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and Olin Corporation (OLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUN achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than OLN's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HUN has underperformed OLN with an annualized return of 1.08%, while OLN has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.


HUN

1D
-4.72%
1M
-20.30%
YTD
16.44%
6M
16.09%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
-19.44%
5Y*
-11.82%
10Y*
1.08%

OLN

1D
-2.14%
1M
-17.25%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.63%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
-21.63%
5Y*
-12.51%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUN vs. OLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
16.44%-40.65%-24.97%-5.11%-18.97%42.29%7.53%28.98%-40.64%77.93%
OLN
Olin Corporation
4.97%-36.15%-36.29%3.46%-6.63%138.55%50.81%-10.77%-41.88%42.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HUN and OLN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2005

0.57

The correlation between HUN and OLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUN:

$1.99B

OLN:

$2.45B

EPS

HUN:

-$1.92

OLN:

-$1.11

PS Ratio

HUN:

0.35

OLN:

0.37

PB Ratio

HUN:

0.29

OLN:

1.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUN:

$5.69B

OLN:

$6.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUN:

$733.00M

OLN:

$352.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

HUN:

$54.00M

OLN:

$374.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUN vs. OLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUN
HUN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

OLN
OLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
OLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUN vs. OLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and Olin Corporation (OLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUNOLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.49

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

1.10

+0.02

HUN vs. OLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUN Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is comparable to the OLN Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUN and OLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUN vs. OLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUN drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than OLN's maximum drawdown of -73.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUN and OLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUNOLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.21%

-73.80%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.08%

-31.45%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.81%

-69.26%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.67%

-71.87%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.67%

-73.80%

-4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.24%

-64.80%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-24.99%

-8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.15%

13.92%

+1.23%

Volatility

HUN vs. OLN - Volatility Comparison

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) has a higher volatility of 23.02% compared to Olin Corporation (OLN) at 10.87%. This indicates that HUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUNOLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.02%

10.87%

+12.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.90%

39.27%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.16%

56.06%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.28%

44.95%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.35%

47.21%

-6.86%

Dividends

HUN vs. OLN - Dividend Comparison

HUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than OLN's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
4.46%8.38%5.55%3.78%3.09%2.08%2.59%2.69%3.37%1.50%2.62%4.40%
OLN
Olin Corporation
3.71%3.84%2.37%1.48%1.51%1.39%3.26%4.64%3.98%2.25%3.12%4.63%

Financials

HUN vs. OLN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huntsman Corporation and Olin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B2.60B20222023202420252026
1.42B
1.58B
(HUN) Total Revenue
(OLN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUN vs. OLN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huntsman Corporation and Olin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
12.9%
0
Portfolio components
HUN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a gross profit of 183.00M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

OLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HUN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported an operating income of -16.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.1%.

OLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported an operating income of -78.30M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.0%.

HUN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a net income of -53.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

OLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a net income of -83.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUN and OLN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUN has higher volatility (23.02%) compared to OLN (10.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUN dropped -92.21% vs OLN's -73.80%.

HUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUN and OLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer