PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HUN vs. EME
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HUNEME
YTD Return-19.20%132.90%
1Y Return-19.24%130.59%
3Y Return (Ann)-13.63%57.47%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.07%41.51%
10Y Return (Ann)0.28%27.97%
Sharpe Ratio-0.534.45
Sortino Ratio-0.644.62
Omega Ratio0.931.69
Calmar Ratio-0.309.39
Martin Ratio-1.4030.08
Ulcer Index10.39%4.56%
Daily Std Dev27.20%30.85%
Max Drawdown-92.20%-70.56%
Current Drawdown-47.40%-3.86%

Fundamentals


HUNEME
Market Cap$3.37B$23.65B
EPS-$0.60$19.67
PEG Ratio1.791.32
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.99B$14.24B
Gross Profit (TTM)$830.00M$2.63B
EBITDA (TTM)$258.00M$1.34B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between HUN and EME is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

HUN vs. EME - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HUN achieves a -19.20% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 132.90% return. Over the past 10 years, HUN has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 0.28%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 27.97% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-19.98%
29.92%
HUN
EME

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUN vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUN, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUN, currently valued at -0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUN, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUN, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUN, currently valued at -1.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.40
EME
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EME, currently valued at 4.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EME, currently valued at 4.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EME, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.69
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EME, currently valued at 9.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.009.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EME, currently valued at 30.08, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0030.08

HUN vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUN Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 4.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUN and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.000.002.004.006.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.53
4.45
HUN
EME

Dividends

HUN vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

HUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than EME's 0.19% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
5.02%3.78%3.09%2.08%2.59%2.69%3.37%1.50%2.62%4.40%2.19%2.03%
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.19%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%0.72%0.42%

Drawdowns

HUN vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUN drawdown since its inception was -92.20%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUN and EME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.40%
-3.86%
HUN
EME

Volatility

HUN vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Huntsman Corporation (HUN) is 7.72%, while EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that HUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.72%
9.53%
HUN
EME

Financials

HUN vs. EME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huntsman Corporation and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items