PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUN vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUN vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUN achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than ARLP's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, HUN has underperformed ARLP with an annualized return of 1.08%, while ARLP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.87% annualized return.


HUN

1D
-4.72%
1M
-20.30%
YTD
16.44%
6M
16.09%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
-19.44%
5Y*
-11.82%
10Y*
1.08%

ARLP

1D
3.78%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
10.30%
6M
9.74%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
41.38%
10Y*
14.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUN vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
16.44%-40.65%-24.97%-5.11%-18.97%42.29%7.53%28.98%-40.64%77.93%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.30%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-28.90%-1.90%-4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HUN and ARLP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2005

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between HUN and ARLP has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUN:

$1.99B

ARLP:

$3.14B

EPS

HUN:

-$1.92

ARLP:

$72.64

PS Ratio

HUN:

0.35

ARLP:

0.01

PB Ratio

HUN:

0.29

ARLP:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUN:

$5.69B

ARLP:

$517.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUN:

$733.00M

ARLP:

$353.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

HUN:

$54.00M

ARLP:

$82.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUN vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUN
HUN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUN vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUNARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.04

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.19

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

0.35

+0.77

HUN vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUN Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUN and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUN vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUN drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUN and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUNARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.21%

-90.52%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.08%

-17.63%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.81%

-20.83%

-50.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.67%

-29.13%

-49.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.67%

-85.26%

+6.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.24%

-13.77%

-52.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-24.31%

-9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.15%

9.65%

+5.50%

Volatility

HUN vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Huntsman Corporation (HUN) has a higher volatility of 23.02% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 7.09%. This indicates that HUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUNARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.02%

7.09%

+15.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.90%

16.50%

+29.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.16%

23.38%

+35.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.28%

33.45%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.35%

50.20%

-9.85%

Dividends

HUN vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

HUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than ARLP's 9.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.83%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
HUN
Huntsman Corporation
4.46%8.38%5.55%3.78%3.09%2.08%2.59%2.69%3.37%1.50%2.62%4.40%

Financials

HUN vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huntsman Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B20222023202420252026
1.42B
516.02B
(HUN) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUN vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huntsman Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
12.9%
0
Portfolio components
HUN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a gross profit of 183.00M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HUN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported an operating income of -16.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.1%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

HUN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huntsman Corporation reported a net income of -53.00M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUN and ARLP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUN has higher volatility (23.02%) compared to ARLP (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUN dropped -92.21% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

HUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUN and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer