HUMA vs. QQQ
HUMA (Humacyte, Inc.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, HUMA returned -38.90%/yr vs 24.08%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUMA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMA achieves a -28.04% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.13% return.
HUMA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -34.48%
- 6M
- -38.83%
- YTD
- -28.04%
- 1Y
- -70.08%
- 3Y*
- -38.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- YTD
- 16.13%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
HUMA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMA Humacyte, Inc. | -28.04% | -80.98% | 77.82% | 34.60% | -70.90% | -28.92% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.13% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMA and QQQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUMA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HUMA
QQQ
HUMA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humacyte, Inc. (HUMA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUMA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 2.44 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 8.74 | -10.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUMA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMA drawdown since its inception was -96.62%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMA and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.62% | -82.97% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.96% | -11.96% | -67.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.93% | -22.77% | -71.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.93% | -4.51% | -91.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.60% | -32.67% | -43.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.39% | 3.33% | +52.06% |
Volatility
HUMA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Humacyte, Inc. (HUMA) has a higher volatility of 40.87% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.69%. This indicates that HUMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUMA | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.87% | 8.69% | +32.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.50% | 15.40% | +72.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 115.95% | 18.61% | +97.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.55% | 22.80% | +75.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.55% | 22.44% | +76.11% |
Dividends
HUMA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
HUMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMA Humacyte, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUMA and QQQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUMA has higher volatility (40.87%) compared to QQQ (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMA dropped -96.62% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUMA and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer