PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HUBS vs. CTLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HUBSCTLT
YTD Return19.94%31.12%
1Y Return48.68%48.91%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.78%-22.89%
5Y Return (Ann)36.83%3.17%
10Y Return (Ann)34.24%8.69%
Sharpe Ratio1.452.61
Sortino Ratio1.984.70
Omega Ratio1.261.68
Calmar Ratio1.120.89
Martin Ratio3.2815.08
Ulcer Index16.12%4.36%
Daily Std Dev36.41%25.26%
Max Drawdown-69.95%-77.62%
Current Drawdown-18.28%-58.62%

Fundamentals


HUBSCTLT
Market Cap$35.14B$10.75B
EPS-$0.48-$2.28
PEG Ratio3.272.96
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.51B$4.42B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.13B$965.00M
EBITDA (TTM)$2.95M$431.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between HUBS and CTLT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

HUBS vs. CTLT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HUBS achieves a 19.94% return, which is significantly lower than CTLT's 31.12% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBS has outperformed CTLT with an annualized return of 34.24%, while CTLT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.08%
6.63%
HUBS
CTLT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUBS vs. CTLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Catalent, Inc. (CTLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUBS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HUBS, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.28
CTLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 4.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.68
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTLT, currently valued at 15.08, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.08

HUBS vs. CTLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the CTLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBS and CTLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.45
2.61
HUBS
CTLT

Dividends

HUBS vs. CTLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUBS nor CTLT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HUBS vs. CTLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBS drawdown since its inception was -69.95%, smaller than the maximum CTLT drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBS and CTLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.28%
-58.62%
HUBS
CTLT

Volatility

HUBS vs. CTLT - Volatility Comparison

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to Catalent, Inc. (CTLT) at 3.21%. This indicates that HUBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.98%
3.21%
HUBS
CTLT

Financials

HUBS vs. CTLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HubSpot, Inc. and Catalent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items