PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUBB vs. GGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUBB vs. GGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Graco Inc. (GGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBB achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than GGG's -8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBB has outperformed GGG with an annualized return of 18.87%, while GGG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.00% annualized return.


HUBB

1D
0.07%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
9.89%
6M
11.50%
1Y
25.70%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
22.32%
10Y*
18.87%

GGG

1D
0.70%
1M
-5.55%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
-10.32%
1Y
-10.66%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUBB vs. GGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
9.89%7.43%28.94%42.40%15.08%35.60%8.89%52.88%-24.61%18.83%
GGG
Graco Inc.
-8.73%-1.46%-1.68%30.62%-15.48%12.56%40.97%25.94%-6.34%65.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HUBB and GGG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.60

The correlation between HUBB and GGG shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HUBB:

$16.89

GGG:

$4.09

PE Ratio

HUBB:

28.72

GGG:

18.18

PEG Ratio

HUBB:

1.20

GGG:

3.57

PS Ratio

HUBB:

4.34

GGG:

4.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUBB:

$6.00B

GGG:

$2.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUBB:

$2.13B

GGG:

$1.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

HUBB:

$1.44B

GGG:

$712.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUBB vs. GGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBB
HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GGG
GGG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBB vs. GGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Graco Inc. (GGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUBBGGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.92

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

-0.49

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.16

-1.29

+5.45

HUBB vs. GGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the GGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBB and GGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUBBGGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

-0.56

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.04

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.43

+0.23

Drawdowns

HUBB vs. GGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBB drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, smaller than the maximum GGG drawdown of -68.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBB and GGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUBBGGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.63%

-68.77%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-21.92%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.65%

-21.92%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-28.98%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

-30.60%

-11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.75%

-21.37%

+8.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-12.10%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.20%

8.27%

-2.07%

Volatility

HUBB vs. GGG - Volatility Comparison

Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Graco Inc. (GGG) at 4.44%. This indicates that HUBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUBBGGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

4.44%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.21%

14.18%

+8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.51%

18.99%

+9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.17%

22.62%

+6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.77%

24.75%

+4.02%

Dividends

HUBB vs. GGG - Dividend Comparison

HUBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GGG's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGG
Graco Inc.
1.53%1.34%1.21%1.08%1.25%0.93%0.97%1.23%1.27%1.06%1.59%1.67%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
1.15%1.21%1.19%1.39%1.82%1.92%2.37%2.32%3.17%2.12%2.22%0.00%

Financials

HUBB vs. GGG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hubbell Incorporated and Graco Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
1.52B
540.14M
(HUBB) Total Revenue
(GGG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUBB vs. GGG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hubbell Incorporated and Graco Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
33.3%
52.0%
Portfolio components
HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 505.30M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

GGG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 280.64M and revenue of 540.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 263.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

GGG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 137.78M and revenue of 540.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 181.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

GGG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 118.51M and revenue of 540.14M, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUBB and GGG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUBB has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to GGG (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBB dropped -41.63% vs GGG's -68.77%.

HUBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUBB and GGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer