PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTGC vs. WHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HTGC vs. WHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTGC achieves a -12.68% return, which is significantly lower than WHF's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HTGC has outperformed WHF with an annualized return of 13.52%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.


HTGC

1D
-1.08%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-12.68%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
-1.58%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
13.52%

WHF

1D
-1.01%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
6.36%
6M
3.77%
1Y
-6.60%
3Y*
-2.03%
5Y*
-2.79%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTGC vs. WHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
-12.68%3.54%33.33%42.91%-10.42%26.50%14.49%39.86%-6.86%1.86%
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
6.36%-15.36%-8.52%6.26%-6.23%25.77%19.14%20.83%4.80%21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HTGC and WHF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2012

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HTGC:

$3.05B

WHF:

$152.74M

EPS

HTGC:

$1.49

WHF:

$0.69

PE Ratio

HTGC:

10.41

WHF:

10.01

PS Ratio

HTGC:

5.21

WHF:

3.31

PB Ratio

HTGC:

1.37

WHF:

0.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

HTGC:

$578.18M

WHF:

$47.81M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HTGC:

$510.74M

WHF:

$14.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

HTGC:

$380.44M

WHF:

-$4.37M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTGC vs. WHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTGC
HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

WHF
WHF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
WHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHF Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTGC vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTGCWHFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.07

-0.24

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.06

-0.15

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

-0.25

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.18

-0.48

+0.30

HTGC vs. WHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the WHF Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTGC and WHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTGCWHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

-0.24

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.12

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.29

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.24

+0.11

Drawdowns

HTGC vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTGC drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, which is greater than WHF's maximum drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTGC and WHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTGCWHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.21%

-57.48%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.74%

-26.51%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.97%

-37.91%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.11%

-37.91%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.54%

-57.48%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.44%

-25.85%

+8.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-8.92%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

14.08%

-3.41%

Volatility

HTGC vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) is 5.02%, while WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that HTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTGCWHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

10.15%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.92%

20.58%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.06%

28.10%

-5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

22.96%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

31.54%

-3.71%

Dividends

HTGC vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison

HTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, less than WHF's 22.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
11.66%9.99%9.56%11.40%13.77%9.76%9.02%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
22.71%20.72%18.44%12.60%11.26%10.03%13.96%11.79%11.16%10.58%11.67%12.37%

Financials

HTGC vs. WHF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hercules Capital, Inc. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
123.49M
15.86M
(HTGC) Total Revenue
(WHF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HTGC vs. WHF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hercules Capital, Inc. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
86.0%
0
Portfolio components
HTGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.20M and revenue of 123.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.

WHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 15.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HTGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 65.43M and revenue of 123.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

WHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 15.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

HTGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 123.49M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

WHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 5.73M and revenue of 15.86M, resulting in a net margin of 36.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HTGC and WHF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WHF has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to HTGC (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTGC dropped -68.21% vs WHF's -57.48%.

HTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTGC and WHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer