HSIC vs. OMI

In the year-to-date period, HSIC achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than OMI's -47.67% return. Over the past 10 years, HSIC has outperformed OMI with an annualized return of 3.38%, while OMI has yielded a comparatively lower -13.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) and Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HSIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the OMI Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSIC and OMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither HSIC nor OMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HSIC drawdown since its inception was -78.48%, smaller than the maximum OMI drawdown of -93.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSIC and OMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) is 7.58%, while Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) has a volatility of 42.79%. This indicates that HSIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Henry Schein, Inc. and Owens & Minor, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.