PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HROW vs. HALO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HROWHALO
YTD Return403.75%40.07%
1Y Return291.81%47.24%
3Y Return (Ann)80.15%10.08%
5Y Return (Ann)61.72%27.93%
10Y Return (Ann)20.40%18.98%
Sharpe Ratio3.311.19
Sortino Ratio3.721.82
Omega Ratio1.601.24
Calmar Ratio3.181.02
Martin Ratio15.315.17
Ulcer Index19.55%8.62%
Daily Std Dev90.47%37.66%
Max Drawdown-99.46%-74.26%
Current Drawdown-59.12%-19.64%

Fundamentals


HROWHALO
Market Cap$2.00B$6.62B
EPS-$0.95$2.58
Total Revenue (TTM)$119.88M$657.27M
Gross Profit (TTM)$85.49M$501.51M
EBITDA (TTM)-$630.00K$375.07M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between HROW and HALO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

HROW vs. HALO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HROW achieves a 403.75% return, which is significantly higher than HALO's 40.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HROW has outperformed HALO with an annualized return of 20.40%, while HALO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
432.50%
33.74%
HROW
HALO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HROW vs. HALO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HROW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HROW, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HROW, currently valued at 3.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HROW, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HROW, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HROW, currently valued at 15.31, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0015.31
HALO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HALO, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HALO, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HALO, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HALO, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HALO, currently valued at 5.17, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.17

HROW vs. HALO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HROW Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the HALO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HROW and HALO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
3.31
1.19
HROW
HALO

Dividends

HROW vs. HALO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HROW nor HALO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

HROW vs. HALO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HROW drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than HALO's maximum drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HROW and HALO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-59.12%
-19.64%
HROW
HALO

Volatility

HROW vs. HALO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) is 12.09%, while Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) has a volatility of 14.36%. This indicates that HROW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HALO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
12.09%
14.36%
HROW
HALO

Financials

HROW vs. HALO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Harrow Health, Inc. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items