HR vs. VOO
HR (Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, HR returned 3.29%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VOO. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HR vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HR achieves a 27.09% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HR has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.29%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
HR
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 28.31%
- YTD
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 33.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.69%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $84.13M | $80.36M | $89.23M | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
HR vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 27.09% | 6.88% | 6.40% | -4.08% | -19.28% | 16.06% | -4.68% | 26.64% | -7.61% | 10.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HR and VOO is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HR and VOO has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HR vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
HR
VOO
HR vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 2.21 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | 9.44 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HR vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HR drawdown since its inception was -61.36%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HR and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.36% | -33.99% | -27.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -8.90% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.23% | -18.69% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.08% | -24.52% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.08% | -33.99% | -13.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -1.38% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -3.67% | -10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 2.08% | +2.83% |
Volatility
HR vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that HR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HR | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 3.54% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 10.10% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 12.82% | +8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.63% | 16.93% | +11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 18.01% | +11.38% |
Dividends
HR vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
HR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated | 4.57% | 6.49% | 7.32% | 7.20% | 34.01% | 7.89% | 7.26% | 7.34% | 4.22% | 3.74% | 3.96% | 4.24% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HR and VOO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HR has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HR dropped -61.36% vs VOO's -33.99%.
HR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HR and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer