HQH vs. NOBL
HQH (Tekla Healthcare Investors) is a stock, while NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Over the past 10 years, HQH returned 8.18%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for NOBL. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
HQH vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQH achieves a 22.72% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HQH has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 8.18%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
HQH
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- YTD
- 22.72%
- 1Y
- 57.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.99M | $5.83M | $4.15M | |
| $66.40M | $66.46M | $60.79M |
HQH vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors | 22.72% | 34.12% | 10.22% | 1.22% | -17.27% | 7.99% | 24.82% | 26.80% | -13.08% | 15.97% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 10.84% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HQH and NOBL is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between HQH and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HQH vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
HQH
NOBL
HQH vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HQH | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.21 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 1.62 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 4.10 | +11.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HQH vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQH drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQH and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQH | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.36% | -35.43% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -9.11% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.14% | -15.36% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.55% | -17.92% | -19.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.55% | -35.43% | -2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -2.31% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -3.46% | -17.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 3.59% | +0.19% |
Volatility
HQH vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) have volatilities of 4.89% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HQH | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 5.07% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | 9.11% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 11.92% | +8.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 14.48% | +5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 16.63% | +4.75% |
Dividends
HQH vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
HQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors | 10.62% | 11.56% | 14.21% | 9.66% | 9.50% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 8.24% | 10.75% | 8.78% | 9.80% | 11.97% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HQH and NOBL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOBL has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to HQH (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HQH dropped -62.36% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
HQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HQH and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer