PortfoliosLab logo
HP vs. IBM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HP and IBM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HP vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HP:

-1.06

IBM:

2.31

Sortino Ratio

HP:

-1.55

IBM:

3.12

Omega Ratio

HP:

0.79

IBM:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

HP:

-0.71

IBM:

3.90

Martin Ratio

HP:

-2.03

IBM:

11.91

Ulcer Index

HP:

26.51%

IBM:

5.40%

Daily Std Dev

HP:

51.48%

IBM:

27.82%

Max Drawdown

HP:

-85.78%

IBM:

-69.40%

Current Drawdown

HP:

-75.94%

IBM:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HP:

$1.77B

IBM:

$247.93B

EPS

HP:

$2.20

IBM:

$5.84

PE Ratio

HP:

8.09

IBM:

45.68

PEG Ratio

HP:

5.78

IBM:

1.87

PS Ratio

HP:

0.57

IBM:

3.95

PB Ratio

HP:

0.60

IBM:

9.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

HP:

$3.08B

IBM:

$62.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HP:

$691.68M

IBM:

$35.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

HP:

$828.24M

IBM:

$12.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HP achieves a -46.27% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HP has underperformed IBM with an annualized return of -9.58%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.62% annualized return.


HP

YTD

-46.27%

1M

-17.21%

6M

-48.86%

1Y

-54.42%

3Y*

-25.12%

5Y*

1.99%

10Y*

-9.58%

IBM

YTD

23.73%

1M

13.14%

6M

30.71%

1Y

63.60%

3Y*

33.13%

5Y*

23.63%

10Y*

9.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HP vs. IBM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HP is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HP is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HP is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HP is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HP is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HP is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBM is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBM is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBM is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBM is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HP vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HP Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HP and IBM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HP vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

HP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than IBM's 2.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HP
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
6.96%4.72%5.18%2.49%4.22%8.29%6.25%5.88%4.33%3.59%5.14%3.89%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.49%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%2.65%

Drawdowns

HP vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HP drawdown since its inception was -85.78%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HP and IBM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HP vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) has a higher volatility of 12.82% compared to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) at 9.56%. This indicates that HP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HP vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
1.02B
14.54B
(HP) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HP vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
15.4%
55.2%
(HP) Gross Margin
(IBM) Gross Margin
HP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 156.73M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.03B and revenue of 14.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

HP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.16M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 14.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

HP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. reported a net income of 1.65M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 14.54B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.