HP vs. DVN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) and Devon Energy Corporation (DVN).

Performance

HP vs. DVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) and Devon Energy Corporation (DVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HP vs. DVN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc.	21.36%	-6.27%	-7.83%	-23.21%	115.23%	6.19%	-44.28%	0.49%	-22.58%	-12.25%
DVN Devon Energy Corporation	33.34%	15.03%	-25.21%	-23.08%	50.86%	199.88%	-35.34%	16.81%	-45.09%	-8.74%

Fundamentals

EPS HP : -$4.56 DVN : $4.18
PS Ratio HP : 0.75 DVN : 1.85
Total Revenue (TTM) HP : $3.07B DVN : $16.61B
Gross Profit (TTM) HP : $421.90M DVN : $3.77B
EBITDA (TTM) HP : $456.31M DVN : $7.36B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HP achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly lower than DVN's 33.34% return. Over the past 10 years, HP has underperformed DVN with an annualized return of -0.10%, while DVN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.05% annualized return.

HP

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 21.36%
• 6M: 51.98%
• 1Y: 36.18%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: -0.10%

DVN

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: 8.66%
• YTD: 33.34%
• 6M: 39.18%
• 1Y: 32.68%
• 3Y*: 1.75%
• 5Y*: 21.55%
• 10Y*: 10.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HP vs. DVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HP

HP Risk / Return Rank: 61
HP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
HP Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HP Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DVN

DVN Risk / Return Rank: 65
DVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
DVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DVN Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DVN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HP vs. DVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) and Devon Energy Corporation (DVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HP	DVN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	0.79	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.28	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	1.14	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.68	3.08	-1.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HP vs. DVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HP Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the DVN Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HP and DVN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HP	DVN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	0.79	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.52	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	0.20	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.22	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between HP and DVN is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HP vs. DVN - Dividend Comparison

HP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than DVN's 1.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc.	2.90%	3.49%	4.72%	5.18%	2.49%	4.22%	8.29%	6.25%	5.88%	4.33%	3.59%	5.14%
DVN Devon Energy Corporation	1.98%	2.62%	4.43%	4.55%	8.41%	5.24%	4.30%	1.35%	1.33%	0.58%	0.92%	3.00%

Drawdowns

HP vs. DVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HP drawdown since its inception was -85.78%, smaller than the maximum DVN drawdown of -94.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HP and DVN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HP	DVN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.78%	-94.93%	+9.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.63%	-29.32%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.47%	-61.45%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.87%	-88.51%	+6.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.09%	-37.82%	-11.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.05%	-35.91%	-6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.73%	10.79%	+11.94%

Volatility

HP vs. DVN - Volatility Comparison

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) at 8.65%. This indicates that HP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HP	DVN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.99%	8.65%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.93%	22.52%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.02%	41.79%	+11.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.80%	41.63%	+7.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.24%	49.76%	+1.48%

Financials