PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNI vs. MLKN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HNI vs. MLKN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HNI Corporation (HNI) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNI achieves a -9.53% return, which is significantly lower than MLKN's -3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, HNI has outperformed MLKN with an annualized return of 1.52%, while MLKN has yielded a comparatively lower -2.73% annualized return.


HNI

1D
8.99%
1M
22.95%
YTD
-9.53%
6M
-10.15%
1Y
-19.64%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
1.52%

MLKN

1D
7.35%
1M
12.87%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-2.78%
1Y
1.38%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
-15.92%
10Y*
-2.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HNI vs. MLKN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HNI
HNI Corporation
-9.53%-13.91%23.75%53.16%-29.89%25.86%-4.24%9.30%-5.34%-28.99%
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
-3.74%-15.73%-13.01%32.01%-44.89%17.99%-17.99%40.49%-22.84%19.65%

Correlation

The correlation between HNI and MLKN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.52

The correlation between HNI and MLKN shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.75 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HNI:

-$0.49

MLKN:

$1.27

PS Ratio

HNI:

0.33

MLKN:

0.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

HNI:

$3.59B

MLKN:

$3.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HNI:

$1.43B

MLKN:

$1.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

HNI:

$224.70M

MLKN:

$114.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HNI Corporation

MillerKnoll, Inc.

Return for Risk

HNI vs. MLKN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNI
HNI Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNI Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MLKN
MLKN Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MLKN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLKN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLKN Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MLKN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLKN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNI vs. MLKN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HNI Corporation (HNI) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HNIMLKNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.06

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

0.04

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

0.06

-0.95

HNI vs. MLKN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNI Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the MLKN Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNI and MLKN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HNI vs. MLKN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNI drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than MLKN's maximum drawdown of -79.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNI and MLKN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HNIMLKNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.09%

-79.45%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.91%

-37.80%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.12%

-53.31%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.12%

-70.85%

+23.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.36%

-72.06%

+7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.76%

-59.97%

+28.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.90%

-28.05%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.26%

21.39%

+0.87%

Volatility

HNI vs. MLKN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HNI Corporation (HNI) is 13.63%, while MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) has a volatility of 15.05%. This indicates that HNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLKN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HNIMLKNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.63%

15.05%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.19%

38.50%

-9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.08%

48.64%

-12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.00%

45.65%

-13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.53%

44.73%

-7.20%

Dividends

HNI vs. MLKN - Dividend Comparison

HNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than MLKN's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HNI
HNI Corporation
3.67%3.21%2.60%3.06%4.47%2.94%3.54%3.23%3.30%2.93%1.95%2.90%
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
4.35%4.10%3.32%2.81%3.57%1.91%1.18%1.96%2.50%1.75%1.86%2.00%

Financials

HNI vs. MLKN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HNI Corporation and MillerKnoll, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.35B
1.00B
(HNI) Total Revenue
(MLKN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HNI vs. MLKN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HNI Corporation and MillerKnoll, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%20222023202420252026
37.1%
39.4%
Portfolio components
HNI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HNI Corporation reported a gross profit of 499.90M and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

MLKN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a gross profit of 395.60M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

HNI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HNI Corporation reported an operating income of -36.40M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.

MLKN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.50M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

HNI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HNI Corporation reported a net income of -55.60M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of -4.1%.

MLKN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HNI and MLKN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLKN has higher volatility (15.05%) compared to HNI (13.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HNI dropped -86.09% vs MLKN's -79.45%.

MLKN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HNI and MLKN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer