HMAX.TO vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HMAX.TO (Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. HMAX.TO is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HMAX.TO returned 21.76%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMAX.TO achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 9.26% return.

HMAX.TO

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 35.28%
• 3Y*: 21.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 25.53%
• 3Y*: 15.13%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	11.17%	27.20%	20.65%	0.77%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	9.26%	4.27%	29.61%	14.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HMAX.TO and QYLD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023	0.23

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HMAX.TO	QYLD
Financial Services	100.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMAX.TO

HMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HMAX.TO	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.56	2.81	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.03	3.87	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.57	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	6.90	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.27	24.96	-3.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMAX.TO and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMAX.TO	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56	2.81	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.77	+0.77

Drawdowns

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -20.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMAX.TO	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-20.61%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.29%	-3.71%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.48%	-18.86%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	0.00%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-4.01%	+1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	1.03%	+0.63%

Volatility

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.87%. This indicates that HMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HMAX.TO	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	1.87%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.55%	7.42%	+1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	9.14%	+0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.42%	13.74%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.42%	14.77%	-3.35%

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMAX.TO Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	11.59%	12.29%	14.08%	15.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMAX.TO and QYLD in my portfolio?

HMAX.TO and QYLD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HMAX.TO or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMAX.TO or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between HMAX.TO and QYLD?

HMAX.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HMAX.TO and 0.60% for QYLD.