PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HMAX.TO vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HMAX.TO and QYLD is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.83%
12.72%
HMAX.TO
QYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HMAX.TO:

2.29

QYLD:

1.90

Sortino Ratio

HMAX.TO:

3.09

QYLD:

2.59

Omega Ratio

HMAX.TO:

1.44

QYLD:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

HMAX.TO:

4.17

QYLD:

2.62

Martin Ratio

HMAX.TO:

13.30

QYLD:

13.91

Ulcer Index

HMAX.TO:

1.52%

QYLD:

1.46%

Daily Std Dev

HMAX.TO:

8.84%

QYLD:

10.72%

Max Drawdown

HMAX.TO:

-15.34%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

HMAX.TO:

-2.20%

QYLD:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMAX.TO achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 4.51% return.


HMAX.TO

YTD

0.69%

1M

-0.84%

6M

12.27%

1Y

20.74%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QYLD

YTD

4.51%

1M

2.11%

6M

12.72%

1Y

21.07%

5Y*

8.00%

10Y*

8.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


HMAX.TO
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
Expense ratio chart for HMAX.TO: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for QYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMAX.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HMAX.TO is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HMAX.TO is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HMAX.TO is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HMAX.TO is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HMAX.TO is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HMAX.TO is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HMAX.TO, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.361.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for HMAX.TO, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.872.44
The chart of Omega ratio for HMAX.TO, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.251.42
The chart of Calmar ratio for HMAX.TO, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.492.44
The chart of Martin ratio for HMAX.TO, currently valued at 6.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.5112.93
HMAX.TO
QYLD

The current HMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMAX.TO and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.36
1.78
HMAX.TO
QYLD

Dividends

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

HMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, more than QYLD's 11.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HMAX.TO
Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
14.11%14.08%15.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.19%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMAX.TO and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.63%
0
HMAX.TO
QYLD

Volatility

HMAX.TO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Canadian Financials YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (HMAX.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 2.27% and 2.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.27%
2.25%
HMAX.TO
QYLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab