PortfoliosLab logo
HLT vs. MTN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HLT and MTN is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HLT vs. MTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HLT:

0.97

MTN:

-0.64

Sortino Ratio

HLT:

1.49

MTN:

-0.80

Omega Ratio

HLT:

1.19

MTN:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

HLT:

0.95

MTN:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

HLT:

2.94

MTN:

-1.45

Ulcer Index

HLT:

8.47%

MTN:

15.20%

Daily Std Dev

HLT:

25.43%

MTN:

33.37%

Max Drawdown

HLT:

-50.82%

MTN:

-77.54%

Current Drawdown

HLT:

-6.41%

MTN:

-53.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLT:

$60.80B

MTN:

$5.69B

EPS

HLT:

$6.34

MTN:

$6.86

PE Ratio

HLT:

40.34

MTN:

22.23

PEG Ratio

HLT:

1.55

MTN:

2.00

PS Ratio

HLT:

12.78

MTN:

1.93

PB Ratio

HLT:

0.00

MTN:

10.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLT:

$11.30B

MTN:

$1.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLT:

$3.03B

MTN:

$514.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

HLT:

$2.55B

MTN:

$218.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly higher than MTN's -17.52% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed MTN with an annualized return of 16.13%, while MTN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.


HLT

YTD

3.54%

1M

21.53%

6M

3.02%

1Y

25.49%

5Y*

28.86%

10Y*

16.13%

MTN

YTD

-17.52%

1M

10.17%

6M

-11.27%

1Y

-21.51%

5Y*

-1.58%

10Y*

6.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HLT vs. MTN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HLT is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HLT is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HLT is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HLT is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HLT is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HLT is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MTN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MTN is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MTN is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MTN is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MTN is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MTN is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MTN is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HLT vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the MTN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLT and MTN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HLT vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison

HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than MTN's 5.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.18%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%0.75%1.03%0.65%0.00%
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
5.82%4.74%3.86%3.21%0.54%0.63%2.94%2.79%1.98%2.01%1.95%1.82%

Drawdowns

HLT vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum MTN drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and MTN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HLT vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) at 7.07%. This indicates that HLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HLT vs. MTN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
2.70B
1.14B
(HLT) Total Revenue
(MTN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HLT vs. MTN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
25.9%
50.3%
(HLT) Gross Margin
(MTN) Gross Margin
HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 697.00M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.9%.

MTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 571.70M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 536.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

MTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 384.42M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 300.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.

MTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 245.55M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 21.6%.