HLT vs. MTN
HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) and MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — HLT in Lodging, MTN in Resorts & Casinos. Over the past 10 years, HLT returned 47.99%/yr vs 3.15%/yr for MTN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLT vs. MTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 17.83% return, which is significantly higher than MTN's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed MTN with an annualized return of 47.99%, while MTN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.15% annualized return.
HLT
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 23.78%
- 1Y
- 35.85%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- 22.40%
- 10Y*
- 47.99%
MTN
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- -7.29%
- 3Y*
- -14.80%
- 5Y*
- -13.25%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
HLT vs. MTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 17.83% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 2.94% | -24.88% | -7.96% | -7.06% | -24.89% | 18.15% | 17.77% | 17.34% | 1.74% | 34.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLT and MTN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.46 |
The correlation between HLT and MTN shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HLT:
$6.50
MTN:
$9.55
HLT:
52.03
MTN:
14.08
HLT:
0.84
MTN:
0.34
HLT:
6.53
MTN:
1.11
HLT:
$12.28B
MTN:
$2.92B
HLT:
$5.44B
MTN:
$1.73B
HLT:
$3.00B
MTN:
$417.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLT vs. MTN — Risk / Return Rank
HLT
MTN
HLT vs. MTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLT | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.99 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | -0.28 | +3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | -0.50 | +8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLT | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | -0.22 | +1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | -0.42 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.10 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.21 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
HLT vs. MTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum MTN drawdown of -77.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and MTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLT | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -77.54% | +26.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -26.40% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -46.41% | +20.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -61.17% | +28.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.82% | -61.17% | +10.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -56.15% | +54.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.73% | -26.12% | +16.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 14.68% | -10.25% |
Volatility
HLT vs. MTN - Volatility Comparison
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) have volatilities of 7.23% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLT | MTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 7.06% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 26.28% | -8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 33.70% | -10.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 31.71% | -4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 180.96% | 32.29% | +148.67% |
Dividends
HLT vs. MTN - Dividend Comparison
HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than MTN's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
MTN Vail Resorts, Inc. | 6.61% | 6.69% | 4.74% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 2.94% | 2.79% | 1.98% | 2.01% | 1.95% |
Financials
HLT vs. MTN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLT vs. MTN - Profitability Comparison
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
MTN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.6%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
MTN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 345.05M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.8%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
MTN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vail Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 210.01M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLT and MTN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to MTN (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs MTN's -77.54%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLT and MTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer