PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HL vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


HLAAPL
YTD Return16.99%19.12%
1Y Return32.89%21.98%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.31%15.68%
5Y Return (Ann)19.21%28.87%
10Y Return (Ann)8.71%24.61%
Sharpe Ratio0.611.00
Sortino Ratio1.251.56
Omega Ratio1.141.19
Calmar Ratio0.391.35
Martin Ratio2.213.16
Ulcer Index14.87%7.07%
Daily Std Dev53.82%22.45%
Max Drawdown-97.96%-81.80%
Current Drawdown-75.62%-3.39%

Fundamentals


HLAAPL
Market Cap$3.48B$3.39T
EPS-$0.07$6.08
PEG Ratio-3.022.32
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.17B$391.04B
Gross Profit (TTM)$122.36M$180.68B
EBITDA (TTM)$222.71M$134.66B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between HL and AAPL is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

HL vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 19.12% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 8.71%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 24.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.31%
20.49%
HL
AAPL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HL vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HL, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HL, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HL, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HL, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.21
AAPL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AAPL, currently valued at 3.16, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.16

HL vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.61
1.00
HL
AAPL

Dividends

HL vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than AAPL's 0.43% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.57%0.50%0.40%0.71%0.28%0.35%0.51%0.30%0.28%0.63%0.43%0.71%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.43%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%2.10%

Drawdowns

HL vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-75.62%
-3.39%
HL
AAPL

Volatility

HL vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 4.99%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.04%
4.99%
HL
AAPL

Financials

HL vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items