HL.L vs. PSH.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Hargreaves Lansdown plc (HL.L) and Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSH.AS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HL.L or PSH.AS.
Correlation
The correlation between HL.L and PSH.AS is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HL.L vs. PSH.AS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HL.L:
1.38
PSH.AS:
0.30
HL.L:
2.48
PSH.AS:
0.55
HL.L:
1.43
PSH.AS:
1.07
HL.L:
0.49
PSH.AS:
0.35
HL.L:
5.45
PSH.AS:
0.67
HL.L:
6.00%
PSH.AS:
10.24%
HL.L:
23.71%
PSH.AS:
22.97%
HL.L:
-66.79%
PSH.AS:
-57.31%
HL.L:
-47.04%
PSH.AS:
-6.09%
Fundamentals
HL.L:
£5.22B
PSH.AS:
$9.61B
HL.L:
£0.62
PSH.AS:
$13.17
HL.L:
17.76
PSH.AS:
4.41
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL.L achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than PSH.AS's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, HL.L has outperformed PSH.AS with an annualized return of 10.87%, while PSH.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.
HL.L
0.27%
-0.09%
0.14%
32.01%
-8.20%
10.87%
PSH.AS
8.29%
-0.58%
9.67%
8.16%
21.88%
7.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HL.L vs. PSH.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HL.L
PSH.AS
HL.L vs. PSH.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hargreaves Lansdown plc (HL.L) and Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSH.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HL.L vs. PSH.AS - Dividend Comparison
HL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 392.37%, more than PSH.AS's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL.L Hargreaves Lansdown plc | 392.37% | 393.44% | 565.40% | 463.68% | 176.38% | 187.54% | 96.12% | 96.81% | 160.93% | 145.92% | 124.17% | 164.13% |
PSH.AS Pershing Square Holdings Ltd | 1.17% | 1.22% | 1.13% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.14% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HL.L vs. PSH.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL.L drawdown since its inception was -66.79%, which is greater than PSH.AS's maximum drawdown of -57.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL.L and PSH.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HL.L vs. PSH.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hargreaves Lansdown plc (HL.L) is 2.51%, while Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSH.AS) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that HL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSH.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HL.L vs. PSH.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hargreaves Lansdown plc and Pershing Square Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities