HIMX vs. CRUS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS).

Performance

HIMX vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HIMX vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc.	-2.32%	6.02%	37.24%	4.73%	-54.85%	120.20%	177.82%	-22.45%	-66.70%	77.20%
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc.	24.16%	19.00%	19.70%	11.69%	-19.06%	11.95%	-0.25%	148.37%	-36.02%	-8.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HIMX : $1.40B CRUS : $7.75B
EPS HIMX : $0.25 CRUS : $7.62
PE Ratio HIMX : 31.79 CRUS : 19.32
PS Ratio HIMX : 1.68 CRUS : 3.95
PB Ratio HIMX : 1.56 CRUS : 3.60
Total Revenue (TTM) HIMX : $829.72M CRUS : $1.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) HIMX : $253.62M CRUS : $1.04B
EBITDA (TTM) HIMX : $76.56M CRUS : $521.26M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMX achieves a -2.32% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 24.16% return. Over the past 10 years, HIMX has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 0.27%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.75% annualized return.

HIMX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 9.44%
• YTD: -2.32%
• 6M: -7.41%
• 1Y: 11.91%
• 3Y*: 4.37%
• 5Y*: -4.50%
• 10Y*: 0.27%

CRUS

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 24.16%
• 6M: 17.04%
• 1Y: 47.38%
• 3Y*: 10.39%
• 5Y*: 10.93%
• 10Y*: 14.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HIMX vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMX

HIMX Risk / Return Rank: 49
HIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
HIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
HIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CRUS

CRUS Risk / Return Rank: 77
CRUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CRUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CRUS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CRUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CRUS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMX vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMX	CRUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	1.20	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	1.78	-1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.24	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	2.12	-1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.94	6.80	-5.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMX vs. CRUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMX and CRUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMX	CRUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	1.20	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.30	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00	0.37	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.10	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between HIMX and CRUS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HIMX vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

HIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while CRUS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc.	4.62%	4.52%	3.61%	7.91%	20.13%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%	2.62%	2.21%	1.99%	3.54%
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HIMX vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMX drawdown since its inception was -87.60%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMX and CRUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMX	CRUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.60%	-97.48%	+9.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.00%	-21.45%	-7.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.23%	-46.85%	-19.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.74%	-55.94%	-30.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.50%	-1.05%	-34.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-52.99%	+2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.17%	7.01%	+7.16%

Volatility

HIMX vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Himax Technologies, Inc. (HIMX) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 11.04%. This indicates that HIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMX	CRUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.00%	11.04%	+13.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.09%	25.15%	+15.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.13%	39.70%	+15.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.20%	36.10%	+23.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.30%	40.29%	+22.01%

Financials

HIMX vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Himax Technologies, Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HIMX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Himax Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.70M and revenue of 203.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.4%.

CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 308.13M and revenue of 580.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.1%.

HIMX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Himax Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.83M and revenue of 203.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 152.93M and revenue of 580.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

HIMX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Himax Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 6.34M and revenue of 203.08M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 140.31M and revenue of 580.62M, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.