PortfoliosLab logo
HIDV vs. SMDV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HIDV and SMDV is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HIDV vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HIDV:

0.42

SMDV:

0.09

Sortino Ratio

HIDV:

0.76

SMDV:

0.43

Omega Ratio

HIDV:

1.11

SMDV:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

HIDV:

0.45

SMDV:

0.18

Martin Ratio

HIDV:

1.81

SMDV:

0.47

Ulcer Index

HIDV:

4.66%

SMDV:

8.21%

Daily Std Dev

HIDV:

18.58%

SMDV:

20.68%

Max Drawdown

HIDV:

-18.76%

SMDV:

-34.12%

Current Drawdown

HIDV:

-8.65%

SMDV:

-14.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a -5.27% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's -4.89% return.


HIDV

YTD

-5.27%

1M

3.10%

6M

-6.37%

1Y

7.78%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SMDV

YTD

-4.89%

1M

2.98%

6M

-11.90%

1Y

1.81%

5Y*

8.64%

10Y*

7.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIDV vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HIDV vs. SMDV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HIDV is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HIDV is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HIDV is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HIDV is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HIDV is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HIDV is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMDV is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMDV is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMDV is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMDV is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMDV is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMDV is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HIDV vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HIDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the SMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDV and SMDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HIDV vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than SMDV's 2.96% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.42%2.29%2.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.96%2.68%2.69%2.51%2.03%2.12%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.08%1.47%

Drawdowns

HIDV vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and SMDV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HIDV vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...