HIBL vs. BNKU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HIBL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - HIBL tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%) while BNKU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HIBL returned 117.87% vs 100.75% for BNKU. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HIBL charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.

Performance

HIBL vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIBL achieves a 51.75% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's 31.56% return.

HIBL

• 1D: 7.65%
• 1M: -11.68%
• 6M: 34.09%
• YTD: 51.75%
• 1Y: 117.87%
• 3Y*: 40.02%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.86%

BNKU

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 7.26%
• 6M: 22.79%
• YTD: 31.56%
• 1Y: 100.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 48.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	$287.92K	$638.07K	$490.60K
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	$5.60M	$5.92M	$6.50M

HIBL vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	51.75%	34.61%
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	31.56%	34.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HIBL and BNKU is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.63

The correlation between HIBL and BNKU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

HIBL vs. BNKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HIBL	BNKU
Technology	46.6%	-
Industrials	15.8%	-
Financial Services	12.4%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	-
Healthcare	5.6%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.1%	-
Communication Services	2.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HIBL vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HIBL

HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 66
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 63
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HIBL vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIBL	BNKU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.71	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.14	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.28	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.47	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.01	6.51	+3.50

HIBL vs. BNKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the BNKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIBL and BNKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIBL vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIBL drawdown since its inception was -88.27%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIBL and BNKU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBL	BNKU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.27%	-61.21%	-27.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.14%	-40.97%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.29%	-6.02%	-21.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.54%	-16.74%	-26.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.82%	15.54%	-3.72%

Volatility

HIBL vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a higher volatility of 29.17% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) at 18.49%. This indicates that HIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIBL	BNKU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.17%	18.49%	+10.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	65.64%	46.92%	+18.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.06%	59.32%	+19.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.80%	71.91%	+11.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.56%	71.91%	+20.65%

HIBL vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIBL has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIBL vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison

HIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HIBL Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares	1.49%	2.43%	0.82%	0.69%	0.00%	0.06%	0.19%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIBL and BNKU in my portfolio?

HIBL and BNKU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIBL or BNKU?

HIBL has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to BNKU (18.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIBL dropped -88.27% vs BNKU's -61.21%.

Which ETF is better, HIBL or BNKU?

On 1-year performance, HIBL leads with 117.87% vs 100.75% for BNKU. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 18.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIBL or BNKU?

Over the 1-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 117.87% return vs 100.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIBL or BNKU?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIBL or BNKU?

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between HIBL and BNKU?

HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%), while BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for HIBL and 0.95% for BNKU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.