HIBB vs. TGT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hibbett Sports, Inc. (HIBB) and Target Corporation (TGT).

Performance

HIBB vs. TGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hibbett Sports, Inc. (HIBB) and Target Corporation (TGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HIBB vs. TGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HIBB Hibbett Sports, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	21.89%	7.72%	-3.40%	57.18%	64.69%	96.08%	-29.90%	-45.31%
TGT Target Corporation	24.48%	-24.50%	-2.27%	-1.35%	-34.24%	32.91%	40.47%	100.17%	4.67%	-5.84%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) HIBB : $1.72B TGT : $106.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) HIBB : $577.32M TGT : $29.05B
EBITDA (TTM) HIBB : $54.28M TGT : $8.77B

Returns By Period

HIBB

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TGT

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 6.43%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 6M: 38.22%
• 1Y: 20.63%
• 3Y*: -6.77%
• 5Y*: -7.05%
• 10Y*: 6.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HIBB vs. TGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGT

TGT Risk / Return Rank: 59
TGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
TGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TGT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
TGT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIBB vs. TGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hibbett Sports, Inc. (HIBB) and Target Corporation (TGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIBB	TGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.34	—

Correlation

The correlation between HIBB and TGT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HIBB vs. TGT - Dividend Comparison

HIBB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HIBB Hibbett Sports, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.29%	1.39%	1.47%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TGT Target Corporation	3.77%	4.62%	3.28%	3.06%	2.66%	1.37%	1.52%	2.03%	3.81%	3.74%	3.21%	2.97%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HIBB	TGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-64.40%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-64.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-48.23%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.97%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HIBB	TGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.64%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	34.55%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	35.19%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	33.19%	—

Financials