PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HI vs. NSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HI vs. NSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HI

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NSC

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
6.34%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
16.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HI vs. NSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
0.82%6.89%-34.04%14.37%-16.24%33.09%23.47%-10.09%-13.58%19.10%
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
7.46%25.65%1.55%-1.63%-15.59%27.26%24.76%32.39%5.22%36.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HI and NSC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.46

The correlation between HI and NSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

HI:

$0.49

NSC:

$15.83

PE Ratio

HI:

65.66

NSC:

19.42

PEG Ratio

HI:

1.77

NSC:

2.95

PS Ratio

HI:

0.90

NSC:

4.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

HI:

$2.52B

NSC:

$12.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HI:

$849.50M

NSC:

$6.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

HI:

$186.80M

NSC:

$5.20B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HI vs. NSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HI

NSC
NSC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HI vs. NSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HI vs. NSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HINSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

Drawdowns

HI vs. NSC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HINSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

Volatility

HI vs. NSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HINSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.54%

Dividends

HI vs. NSC - Dividend Comparison

HI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than NSC's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
2.12%2.85%2.90%1.84%2.04%1.66%2.14%2.53%2.19%1.84%2.12%2.71%
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
1.76%1.87%2.30%2.28%2.01%1.40%1.58%1.85%2.03%1.68%2.18%2.79%

Financials

HI vs. NSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
550.20M
3.00B
(HI) Total Revenue
(NSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HI vs. NSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
33.4%
66.8%
Portfolio components
HI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a gross profit of 183.70M and revenue of 550.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

NSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

HI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.50M and revenue of 550.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

NSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported an operating income of 877.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

HI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a net income of -2.20M and revenue of 550.20M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

NSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a net income of 547.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HI and NSC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HI and NSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer