HI vs. NSC

In the year-to-date period, HI achieves a -32.89% return, which is significantly lower than NSC's -4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, HI has underperformed NSC with an annualized return of -1.10%, while NSC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HI Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the NSC Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HI and NSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than NSC's 2.43% yield.

The maximum HI drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than NSC's maximum drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HI and NSC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) has a higher volatility of 28.53% compared to Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) at 11.16%. This indicates that HI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.