PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
HI vs. LW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HI and LW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

HI vs. LW

Last updated May 30, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HI or LW.

Performance

HI vs. LW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HI:

-0.99

LW:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

HI:

-1.64

LW:

-0.81

Omega Ratio

HI:

0.81

LW:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

HI:

-0.86

LW:

-0.67

Martin Ratio

HI:

-1.54

LW:

-1.34

Ulcer Index

HI:

35.15%

LW:

28.11%

Daily Std Dev

HI:

54.33%

LW:

49.86%

Max Drawdown

HI:

-71.96%

LW:

-56.43%

Current Drawdown

HI:

-61.34%

LW:

-51.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HI:

$1.40B

LW:

$7.53B

EPS

HI:

-$3.86

LW:

$2.56

PEG Ratio

HI:

0.74

LW:

2.08

PS Ratio

HI:

0.46

LW:

1.18

PB Ratio

HI:

1.06

LW:

4.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

HI:

$3.05B

LW:

$6.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HI:

$1.03B

LW:

$1.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

HI:

-$3.20M

LW:

$1.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HI achieves a -35.18% return, which is significantly lower than LW's -17.76% return.

HI

YTD

-35.18%

1M

-12.64%

6M

-40.63%

1Y

-53.81%

3Y*

-20.19%

5Y*

-2.96%

10Y*

-2.00%

LW

YTD

-17.76%

1M

4.69%

6M

-28.36%

1Y

-34.92%

3Y*

-5.73%

5Y*

-0.50%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hillenbrand, Inc.

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HI vs. LW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HI is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HI is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HI is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HI is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HI is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HI is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
LW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LW is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LW is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LW is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LW is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LW is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LW is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HI vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HI Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the LW Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HI and LW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HI vs. LW - Dividend Comparison

HI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than LW's 2.69% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.		4.53%2.90%1.84%2.04%1.66%2.14%2.53%2.19%1.84%2.12%2.71%2.30%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.		2.69%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HI vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HI drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HI and LW.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HI vs. LW - Volatility Comparison

Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) has a higher volatility of 21.26% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 8.93%. This indicates that HI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

HI vs. LW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20212022202320242025
715.90M
1.52B
(HI) Total Revenue
(LW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HI vs. LW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20212022202320242025
33.0%
27.8%
(HI) Gross Margin
(LW) Gross Margin
HI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a gross profit of 236.40M and revenue of 715.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

LW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 422.50M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

HI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.60M and revenue of 715.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.4%.

LW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 248.70M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

HI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a net income of -38.60M and revenue of 715.90M, resulting in a net margin of -5.4%.

LW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 146.00M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.