HI vs. LW
Compare and contrast key facts about Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW).
Performance
HI vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HI vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI Hillenbrand, Inc. | 0.82% | 6.89% | -34.04% | 14.37% | -16.24% | 33.09% | 23.47% | -10.09% | -13.58% | 19.10% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | -7.37% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Fundamentals
HI:
$2.27B
LW:
$5.36B
HI:
$0.49
LW:
$2.15
HI:
65.66
LW:
17.93
HI:
1.77
LW:
0.25
HI:
0.90
LW:
0.83
HI:
1.60
LW:
2.93
HI:
$2.52B
LW:
$6.52B
HI:
$849.50M
LW:
$1.34B
HI:
$186.80M
LW:
$893.90M
Returns By Period
HI
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LW
- 1D
- -8.94%
- 1M
- -17.74%
- YTD
- -7.37%
- 6M
- -37.05%
- 1Y
- -25.78%
- 3Y*
- -26.86%
- 5Y*
- -11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HI vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
HI
LW
HI vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HI | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.12 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between HI and LW is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HI vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
HI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than LW's 3.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI Hillenbrand, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 1.84% | 2.04% | 1.66% | 2.14% | 2.53% | 2.19% | 1.84% | 2.12% | 2.71% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.87% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HI vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HI | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -64.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -64.56% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -20.49% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.26% | — |
Volatility
HI vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HI | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 45.91% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 37.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 35.94% | — |
Financials
HI vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HI vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
HI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a gross profit of 183.70M and revenue of 550.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
HI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.50M and revenue of 550.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
HI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a net income of -2.20M and revenue of 550.20M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.