HI vs. ETN
Compare and contrast key facts about Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HI or ETN.
Correlation
The correlation between HI and ETN is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HI vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HI:
-0.49
ETN:
0.54
HI:
-0.47
ETN:
0.85
HI:
0.94
ETN:
1.13
HI:
-0.40
ETN:
0.87
HI:
-0.72
ETN:
2.25
HI:
28.40%
ETN:
7.67%
HI:
41.72%
ETN:
31.92%
HI:
-71.96%
ETN:
-68.95%
HI:
-33.56%
ETN:
-16.16%
Fundamentals
HI:
$2.20B
ETN:
$124.82B
HI:
-$3.17
ETN:
$9.42
HI:
0.74
ETN:
2.64
HI:
$3.12B
ETN:
$24.88B
HI:
$1.02B
ETN:
$13.31B
HI:
$88.90M
ETN:
$4.16B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HI achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's -4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HI has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 3.65%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.17% annualized return.
HI
11.40%
11.44%
1.41%
-25.18%
6.34%
3.65%
ETN
-4.63%
-7.30%
7.45%
16.92%
27.95%
19.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HI vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HI
ETN
HI vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HI vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
HI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ETN's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI Hillenbrand, Inc. | 2.60% | 2.90% | 1.84% | 2.04% | 1.66% | 2.14% | 2.53% | 2.19% | 1.84% | 2.12% | 2.71% | 2.30% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 2.43% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
HI vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HI drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, roughly equal to the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HI and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HI vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) is 13.13%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 18.87%. This indicates that HI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HI vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities