PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
HI vs. ELS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HI and ELS is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

HI vs. ELS

Last updated May 31, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HI or ELS.

Performance

HI vs. ELS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HI:

-1.04

ELS:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

HI:

-1.64

ELS:

0.59

Omega Ratio

HI:

0.81

ELS:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

HI:

-0.86

ELS:

0.26

Martin Ratio

HI:

-1.54

ELS:

0.75

Ulcer Index

HI:

35.33%

ELS:

9.17%

Daily Std Dev

HI:

54.34%

ELS:

20.72%

Max Drawdown

HI:

-71.96%

ELS:

-58.96%

Current Drawdown

HI:

-61.79%

ELS:

-20.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HI:

$1.39B

ELS:

$12.73B

EPS

HI:

-$3.86

ELS:

$1.94

PEG Ratio

HI:

0.74

ELS:

4.61

PS Ratio

HI:

0.46

ELS:

8.28

PB Ratio

HI:

1.05

ELS:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

HI:

$3.05B

ELS:

$1.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HI:

$1.03B

ELS:

$734.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

HI:

-$3.20M

ELS:

$681.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HI achieves a -35.94% return, which is significantly lower than ELS's -3.80% return. Over the past 10 years, HI has underperformed ELS with an annualized return of -2.31%, while ELS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.

HI

YTD

-35.94%

1M

-3.41%

6M

-41.65%

1Y

-56.14%

3Y*

-20.61%

5Y*

-3.19%

10Y*

-2.31%

ELS

YTD

-3.80%

1M

-1.88%

6M

-9.53%

1Y

4.26%

3Y*

-3.03%

5Y*

2.92%

10Y*

11.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Hillenbrand, Inc.

Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HI vs. ELS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HI is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HI is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HI is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HI is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HI is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HI is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
ELS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ELS is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ELS is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ELS is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ELS is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ELS is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ELS is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HI vs. ELS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HI Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the ELS Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HI and ELS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HI vs. ELS - Dividend Comparison

HI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than ELS's 3.07% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.		4.58%2.90%1.84%2.04%1.66%2.14%2.53%2.19%1.84%2.12%2.71%2.30%
ELS
Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.		3.07%2.87%2.54%2.54%1.66%2.17%1.74%2.27%2.19%2.36%2.25%2.52%

Drawdowns

HI vs. ELS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HI drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than ELS's maximum drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HI and ELS.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HI vs. ELS - Volatility Comparison

Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) has a higher volatility of 18.17% compared to Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. (ELS) at 5.81%. This indicates that HI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

HI vs. ELS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
715.90M
387.33M
(HI) Total Revenue
(ELS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HI vs. ELS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hillenbrand, Inc. and Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
33.0%
63.8%
(HI) Gross Margin
(ELS) Gross Margin
HI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a gross profit of 236.40M and revenue of 715.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

ELS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 247.13M and revenue of 387.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

HI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.60M and revenue of 715.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.4%.

ELS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 233.96M and revenue of 387.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 60.4%.

HI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Hillenbrand, Inc. reported a net income of -38.60M and revenue of 715.90M, resulting in a net margin of -5.4%.

ELS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 109.19M and revenue of 387.33M, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.