PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HG=F vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HG=F vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copper (HG=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.56%
11.84%
HG=F
VOO

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HG=F achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 25.48% return. Over the past 10 years, HG=F has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.21%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.


HG=F

YTD

7.43%

1M

-4.07%

6M

-18.56%

1Y

9.35%

5Y (annualized)

9.56%

10Y (annualized)

3.21%

VOO

YTD

25.48%

1M

0.99%

6M

11.84%

1Y

31.84%

5Y (annualized)

15.62%

10Y (annualized)

13.15%

Key characteristics


HG=FVOO
Sharpe Ratio0.312.69
Sortino Ratio0.593.59
Omega Ratio1.071.50
Calmar Ratio0.283.89
Martin Ratio0.5917.64
Ulcer Index11.82%1.86%
Daily Std Dev22.11%12.20%
Max Drawdown-62.54%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-18.56%-1.40%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between HG=F and VOO is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HG=F vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.312.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.500.592.91
The chart of Omega ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.071.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.000.283.03
The chart of Martin ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.000.5913.34
HG=F
VOO

The current HG=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HG=F and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.31
2.13
HG=F
VOO

Drawdowns

HG=F vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HG=F drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG=F and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.56%
-1.40%
HG=F
VOO

Volatility

HG=F vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Copper (HG=F) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.97%. This indicates that HG=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.64%
3.97%
HG=F
VOO