HG=F vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Copper (HG=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
HG=F vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HG=F vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HG=F Copper | -0.22% | 39.82% | 3.50% | 2.10% | -14.63% | 26.84% | 25.81% | 6.31% | -20.28% | 31.73% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HG=F achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, HG=F has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.99%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
HG=F
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HG=F vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
HG=F
VOO
HG=F vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HG=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 1.01 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.58 | 1.53 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.55 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 7.31 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HG=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.01 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.71 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.79 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.83 | -0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between HG=F and VOO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Drawdowns
HG=F vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HG=F drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG=F and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HG=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -33.99% | -65.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.17% | -11.98% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -24.52% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.54% | -33.99% | -2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -5.55% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.73% | -3.72% | -26.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.05% | 2.55% | +9.50% |
Volatility
HG=F vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Copper (HG=F) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that HG=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HG=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 5.34% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.76% | 9.47% | +11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.91% | 18.11% | +18.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 16.82% | +9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 17.99% | +5.54% |