HG=F vs. ^GSPC
HG=F (Copper) is an asset, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HG=F vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HG=F achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.86% return.
HG=F
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 15.98%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- 20.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
^GSPC
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HG=F vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HG=F Copper | 15.98% | 16.13% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 7.86% | 14.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HG=F and ^GSPC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HG=F vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
HG=F
^GSPC
HG=F vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HG=F | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HG=F | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.91 | -1.70 |
Drawdowns
HG=F vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HG=F drawdown since its inception was -68.86%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -9.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG=F and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HG=F | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.86% | -9.10% | -59.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.97% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.58% | -1.13% | -28.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | — | — |
Volatility
HG=F vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HG=F | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.56% | 12.19% | +23.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 12.19% | +14.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 12.19% | +11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HG=F and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HG=F and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer