PortfoliosLab logo
HG=F vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HG=F and VOO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HG=F vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copper (HG=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HG=F:

-0.17

VOO:

0.67

Sortino Ratio

HG=F:

0.07

VOO:

1.19

Omega Ratio

HG=F:

1.01

VOO:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

HG=F:

-0.09

VOO:

0.80

Martin Ratio

HG=F:

-0.18

VOO:

3.05

Ulcer Index

HG=F:

11.07%

VOO:

4.88%

Daily Std Dev

HG=F:

26.36%

VOO:

19.40%

Max Drawdown

HG=F:

-99.27%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

HG=F:

-10.04%

VOO:

-3.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HG=F achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, HG=F has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.76%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


HG=F

YTD

16.59%

1M

1.48%

6M

14.36%

1Y

-4.67%

5Y*

14.34%

10Y*

4.76%

VOO

YTD

1.08%

1M

9.85%

6M

0.15%

1Y

12.97%

5Y*

17.43%

10Y*

12.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HG=F vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HG=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HG=F is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HG=F is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HG=F vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HG=F Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HG=F and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

HG=F vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HG=F drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG=F and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HG=F vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Copper (HG=F) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 6.16%. This indicates that HG=F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...