HFND vs. RSST

In the year-to-date period, HFND achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly higher than RSST's -10.33% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HFND has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than RSST's 1.04% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the RSST Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFND and RSST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

The maximum HFND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFND and RSST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) is 2.20%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that HFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.