HFMDX vs. XSVM

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HFMDX having a -6.06% return and XSVM slightly higher at -5.81%. Over the past 10 years, HFMDX has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 0.68%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.99% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HFMDX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HFMDX Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFMDX and XSVM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HFMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XSVM's 2.16% yield.

The maximum HFMDX drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than XSVM's maximum drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFMDX and XSVM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund (HFMDX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) have volatilities of 5.82% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.