HFGO vs. VGT
HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. HFGO is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HFGO returned 26.77%/yr vs 33.48%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFGO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
HFGO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFGO achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
HFGO
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 8.28%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
HFGO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 11.58% | 15.52% | 40.73% | 42.45% | -36.69% | -5.15% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HFGO and VGT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HFGO and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
HFGO vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HFGO
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
HFGO
VGT
Communication Services
HFGO
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
HFGO
VGT
Healthcare
HFGO
VGT
Industrials
HFGO
VGT
Financial Services
HFGO
VGT
Energy
HFGO
VGT
Consumer Defensive
HFGO
VGT
-
Basic Materials
HFGO
-
VGT
Real Estate
HFGO
-
VGT
-
Utilities
HFGO
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HFGO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
HFGO
VGT
HFGO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFGO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.69 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 11.77 | -6.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFGO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.95 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
HFGO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFGO drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFGO and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFGO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -54.63% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -16.40% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -27.23% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.48% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -7.95% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 5.13% | +0.54% |
Volatility
HFGO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) is 4.77%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that HFGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HFGO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 6.39% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 16.07% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 20.57% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 25.18% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 24.60% | +1.31% |
HFGO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFGO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HFGO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, HFGO and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to HFGO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFGO dropped -44.64% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 26.77% for HFGO. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, HFGO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 26.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.
HFGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HFGO and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HFGO and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer