HELO vs. RSP
HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HELO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. HELO is actively managed, while RSP is passively managed. Over the past year, HELO returned 11.08% vs 19.50% for RSP. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HELO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
HELO vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HELO achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.
HELO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
HELO vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.31% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 6.30% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between HELO and RSP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between HELO and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
HELO vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HELO
RSP
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HELO
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
HELO
RSP
Communication Services
HELO
RSP
Financial Services
HELO
RSP
Healthcare
HELO
RSP
Industrials
HELO
RSP
Consumer Defensive
HELO
RSP
Energy
HELO
RSP
Utilities
HELO
RSP
Real Estate
HELO
RSP
Basic Materials
HELO
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELO vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
HELO
RSP
HELO vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HELO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.49 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.55 | 9.48 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HELO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 0.57 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
HELO vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELO drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELO and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -59.92% | +49.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.76% | -7.85% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.38% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -6.65% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 2.06% | -0.76% |
Volatility
HELO vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) is 0.70%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that HELO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 2.56% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.99% | 8.29% | -3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.21% | 11.56% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 16.18% | -8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 18.35% | -10.39% |
HELO vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HELO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HELO vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HELO and RSP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HELO dropped -10.89% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 1-year performance, RSP leads with 19.50% vs 11.08% for HELO. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSP has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.
HELO is categorized as Options Trading, while RSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HELO and 0.20% for RSP.
HELO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HELO and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer