PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEI-A vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HEI-A vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HEICO Corporation (HEI-A) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEI-A achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, HEI-A has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 24.48%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.


HEI-A

1D
-0.47%
1M
16.96%
YTD
-2.99%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
24.02%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
24.48%

LMT

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.78%
YTD
7.41%
6M
17.59%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEI-A vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEI-A
HEICO Corporation
-2.99%35.80%30.81%19.03%-6.60%9.94%30.98%42.21%24.78%45.72%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
7.41%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HEI-A and LMT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HEI-A:

$34.52B

LMT:

$118.65B

EPS

HEI-A:

$5.60

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

HEI-A:

43.71

LMT:

24.91

PS Ratio

HEI-A:

7.03

LMT:

1.59

PB Ratio

HEI-A:

6.40

LMT:

15.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

HEI-A:

$4.91B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HEI-A:

$943.00M

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

HEI-A:

$1.12B

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEI-A vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEI-A
HEI-A Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HEI-A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEI-A Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEI-A Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HEI-A Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEI-A Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEI-A vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HEICO Corporation (HEI-A) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEI-ALMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

0.38

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.42

0.67

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.09

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.40

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.34

1.00

-0.66

HEI-A vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEI-A Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEI-A and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEI-ALMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.38

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.38

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.46

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.38

+0.45

Drawdowns

HEI-A vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEI-A drawdown since its inception was -49.70%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEI-A and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEI-ALMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.70%

-79.29%

+29.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.11%

-25.15%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.11%

-31.79%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

-31.79%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.70%

-36.67%

-13.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-23.63%

+12.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-26.84%

+19.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.56%

10.11%

+1.45%

Volatility

HEI-A vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

HEICO Corporation (HEI-A) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.55%. This indicates that HEI-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEI-ALMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

5.55%

+9.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.29%

19.87%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.80%

26.54%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.58%

22.89%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.55%

23.71%

+6.84%

Dividends

HEI-A vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

HEI-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than LMT's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEI-A
HEICO Corporation
0.10%0.09%0.11%0.14%0.15%0.13%0.14%0.08%0.18%0.10%0.25%0.00%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.66%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

HEI-A vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HEICO Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.38B
18.02B
(HEI-A) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HEI-A vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HEICO Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
-33.1%
11.5%
Portfolio components
HEI-A - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HEICO Corporation reported a gross profit of -454.96M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -33.1%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

HEI-A - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HEICO Corporation reported an operating income of 350.44M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.5%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

HEI-A - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HEICO Corporation reported a net income of 233.80M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HEI-A and LMT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEI-A has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to LMT (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEI-A dropped -49.70% vs LMT's -79.29%.

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEI-A and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer