PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEEM vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HEEM has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 9.86%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.


HEEM

1D
0.85%
1M
-4.02%
6M
9.21%
YTD
18.23%
1Y
40.11%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
9.86%
ALL TIME*
7.84%

SPEM

1D
0.77%
1M
-0.37%
6M
4.56%
YTD
9.89%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
8.53%
ALL TIME*
5.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.32M$12.63M$6.04M
$90.49M$105.53M$120.92M

HEEM vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.23%34.02%12.59%10.14%-16.85%-1.82%17.94%18.53%-11.09%27.59%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
9.89%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and SPEM is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2014

0.93

The correlation between HEEM and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEEM vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEEM
SPEM

Technology

45.2%
32.7%

Financial Services

18.5%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.9%

Industrials

6.3%
8.3%

Communication Services

6.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

5.5%
7.7%

Energy

3.2%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.9%

Utilities

1.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

HEEM
45.2%
SPEM
32.7%

Financial Services

HEEM
18.5%
SPEM
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HEEM
7.5%
SPEM
8.9%

Industrials

HEEM
6.3%
SPEM
8.3%

Communication Services

HEEM
6.0%
SPEM
6.6%

Basic Materials

HEEM
5.5%
SPEM
7.7%

Energy

HEEM
3.2%
SPEM
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

HEEM
2.6%
SPEM
3.7%

Healthcare

HEEM
2.5%
SPEM
3.9%

Utilities

HEEM
1.8%
SPEM
2.7%

Real Estate

HEEM
1.0%
SPEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEEM vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HEEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEEMSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

1.91

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

6.31

+3.18

HEEM vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEEMSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-64.41%

+30.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.01%

-11.36%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-17.62%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

-30.03%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-36.06%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.28%

-4.14%

-7.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-14.66%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

3.43%

+0.67%

Volatility

HEEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 5.72%. This indicates that HEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEEMSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

5.72%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.67%

15.43%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.65%

17.70%

+4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.36%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

18.80%

-0.40%

HEEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SPEM's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.25%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.55%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HEEM and SPEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HEEM has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to SPEM (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, HEEM leads with 9.86% vs 8.53% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.55% for SPEM.

HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.07% for SPEM.

HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEEM and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer