PortfoliosLab logo
HDRO vs. TAN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HDRO and TAN is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HDRO vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF (HDRO) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HDRO:

7.50%

TAN:

39.78%

Max Drawdown

HDRO:

-0.93%

TAN:

-95.29%

Current Drawdown

HDRO:

-0.93%

TAN:

-83.81%

Returns By Period


HDRO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TAN

YTD

6.46%

1M

23.07%

6M

1.71%

1Y

-19.04%

5Y*

2.83%

10Y*

-2.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDRO vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDRO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HDRO vs. TAN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HDRO is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HDRO is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HDRO is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HDRO is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HDRO is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HDRO is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAN is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAN is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAN is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAN is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAN is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAN is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HDRO vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF (HDRO) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

HDRO vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

HDRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than TAN's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HDRO
Defiance Next Gen H2 ETF
0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.47%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.70%1.77%5.04%1.60%1.88%

Drawdowns

HDRO vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDRO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDRO and TAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HDRO vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...