HCOW vs. SPYI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HCOW (Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while SPYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HCOW returned 23.43% vs 18.69% for SPYI. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HCOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYI.

Performance

HCOW vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 7.96% return.

HCOW

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 5.12%
• 6M: 9.66%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 23.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

SPYI

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 6.50%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 1Y: 18.69%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	$145.82K	$136.25K	$131.36K
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	$155.71M	$137.58M	$149.04M

HCOW vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	10.71%	5.76%	7.63%	4.66%
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	7.96%	16.67%	19.03%	2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and SPYI is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023	0.60

The correlation between HCOW and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

HCOW vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HCOW	SPYI
Financial Services	20.1%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	17.8%	9.6%
Technology	17.1%	38.3%
Industrials	15.7%	8.4%
Healthcare	10.9%	8.9%
Energy	8.4%	3.0%
Basic Materials	5.8%	1.7%
Communication Services	2.6%	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.6%
Utilities	2.3%	2.2%
Real Estate	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

HCOW vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCOW

HCOW Risk / Return Rank: 76
HCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
HCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
HCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SPYI

SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 72
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCOW vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCOW	SPYI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.59	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.21	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	2.23	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.36	10.69	+0.68

HCOW vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCOW and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and SPYI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCOW	SPYI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.15%	-16.47%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-7.72%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.65%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-1.79%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.61%	+0.28%

Volatility

HCOW vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 3.22%. This indicates that HCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCOW	SPYI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	3.22%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.13%	8.68%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	10.80%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	12.96%	+4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.39%	12.96%	+4.43%

HCOW vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCOW vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.56%, less than SPYI's 11.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	11.56%	10.88%	8.13%	1.99%	0.00%
SPYI NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF	11.93%	11.70%	12.04%	12.01%	4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCOW and SPYI in my portfolio?

HCOW and SPYI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HCOW or SPYI?

HCOW has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to SPYI (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCOW dropped -24.15% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

Which ETF is better, HCOW or SPYI?

On 1-year performance, HCOW leads with 23.43% vs 18.69% for SPYI. On fees, HCOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HCOW or SPYI?

Over the 1-year period, HCOW has performed better with a 23.43% return vs 18.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCOW or SPYI?

HCOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCOW or SPYI?

SPYI has the higher dividend yield at 11.93%, compared with 11.56% for HCOW.

What is the main difference between HCOW and SPYI?

HCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCOW and 0.68% for SPYI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.