PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCMAX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCMAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hillman Value Fund (HCMAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCMAX achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return.


HCMAX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
2.57%
6M
2.85%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCMAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HCMAX
Hillman Value Fund
2.57%10.12%11.09%24.39%-8.05%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HCMAX and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2022

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between HCMAX and VOO has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCMAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCMAX
HCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCMAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hillman Value Fund (HCMAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCMAXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.67

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

11.96

-8.15

HCMAX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCMAX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCMAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCMAX drawdown since its inception was -23.03%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMAX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCMAXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.03%

-33.99%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-8.90%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-18.69%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-3.14%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-3.68%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

1.99%

+1.69%

Volatility

HCMAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hillman Value Fund (HCMAX) is 4.21%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that HCMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCMAXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.83%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

9.82%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

12.46%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.91%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

18.02%

-0.98%

HCMAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCMAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCMAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

HCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.04%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCMAX
Hillman Value Fund
16.04%16.45%21.58%3.09%12.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCMAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to HCMAX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMAX dropped -23.03% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCMAX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer