PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HCM.L vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HCM.L and SPY is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

HCM.L vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HUTCHMED China Ltd (HCM.L) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.96%
7.41%
HCM.L
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HCM.L:

0.07

SPY:

1.75

Sortino Ratio

HCM.L:

0.52

SPY:

2.36

Omega Ratio

HCM.L:

1.06

SPY:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

HCM.L:

0.06

SPY:

2.66

Martin Ratio

HCM.L:

0.17

SPY:

11.01

Ulcer Index

HCM.L:

21.53%

SPY:

2.03%

Daily Std Dev

HCM.L:

54.94%

SPY:

12.77%

Max Drawdown

HCM.L:

-85.93%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

HCM.L:

-58.97%

SPY:

-2.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCM.L achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, HCM.L has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 8.04%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.


HCM.L

YTD

8.94%

1M

10.11%

6M

-2.66%

1Y

4.92%

5Y*

-8.43%

10Y*

8.04%

SPY

YTD

2.36%

1M

-1.07%

6M

7.41%

1Y

19.73%

5Y*

14.21%

10Y*

12.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCM.L vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCM.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCM.L is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCM.L is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCM.L is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCM.L is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCM.L is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCM.L is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCM.L vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HUTCHMED China Ltd (HCM.L) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HCM.L, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.131.56
The chart of Sortino ratio for HCM.L, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.632.10
The chart of Omega ratio for HCM.L, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.071.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for HCM.L, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.112.33
The chart of Martin ratio for HCM.L, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.369.62
HCM.L
SPY

The current HCM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCM.L and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.13
1.56
HCM.L
SPY

Dividends

HCM.L vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

HCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HCM.L
HUTCHMED China Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

HCM.L vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCM.L drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCM.L and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-62.37%
-2.12%
HCM.L
SPY

Volatility

HCM.L vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

HUTCHMED China Ltd (HCM.L) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.32%. This indicates that HCM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.72%
3.32%
HCM.L
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab