PortfoliosLab logo
HCI vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HCI and WM is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HCI vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HCI:

1.54

WM:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

HCI:

1.95

WM:

0.60

Omega Ratio

HCI:

1.28

WM:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

HCI:

1.69

WM:

0.60

Martin Ratio

HCI:

7.97

WM:

1.35

Ulcer Index

HCI:

7.12%

WM:

5.30%

Daily Std Dev

HCI:

39.04%

WM:

20.31%

Max Drawdown

HCI:

-78.79%

WM:

-77.85%

Current Drawdown

HCI:

-3.09%

WM:

-6.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HCI:

$1.76B

WM:

$90.77B

EPS

HCI:

$8.89

WM:

$6.64

PE Ratio

HCI:

18.37

WM:

33.97

PEG Ratio

HCI:

1.70

WM:

2.94

PS Ratio

HCI:

2.34

WM:

3.96

PB Ratio

HCI:

3.58

WM:

10.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

HCI:

$542.93M

WM:

$22.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HCI:

$528.60M

WM:

$8.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

HCI:

$111.94M

WM:

$6.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCI achieves a 39.47% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, HCI has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 17.05%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.


HCI

YTD

39.47%

1M

10.52%

6M

40.98%

1Y

59.54%

5Y*

35.32%

10Y*

17.05%

WM

YTD

10.61%

1M

-3.05%

6M

-0.37%

1Y

7.01%

5Y*

20.04%

10Y*

18.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HCI vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCI is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCI is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCI is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCI is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCI is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCI is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WM is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WM is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WM is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WM is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WM is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HCI vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCI and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HCI vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

HCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than WM's 1.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
0.99%1.37%1.83%4.04%1.92%3.06%3.50%2.90%4.68%3.04%3.44%2.54%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.38%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%

Drawdowns

HCI vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCI drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, roughly equal to the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCI and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HCI vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) has a higher volatility of 10.50% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.00%. This indicates that HCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HCI vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HCI Group, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
161.44M
6.02B
(HCI) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items