HCI vs. WM
Compare and contrast key facts about HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HCI or WM.
Correlation
The correlation between HCI and WM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HCI vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HCI:
0.72
WM:
0.86
HCI:
1.21
WM:
1.24
HCI:
1.17
WM:
1.19
HCI:
0.85
WM:
1.32
HCI:
2.18
WM:
3.02
HCI:
13.18%
WM:
5.23%
HCI:
39.80%
WM:
18.40%
HCI:
-78.79%
WM:
-77.85%
HCI:
-6.67%
WM:
0.00%
Fundamentals
HCI:
$1.25B
WM:
$91.40B
HCI:
$12.05
WM:
$6.81
HCI:
9.85
WM:
33.44
HCI:
1.70
WM:
2.81
HCI:
$588.10M
WM:
$22.06B
HCI:
$566.08M
WM:
$7.62B
HCI:
$182.19M
WM:
$6.01B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCI achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 12.85% return. Over the past 10 years, HCI has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 13.03%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.87% annualized return.
HCI
1.81%
-1.26%
23.90%
23.08%
22.86%
13.03%
WM
12.85%
9.49%
11.65%
16.01%
14.53%
17.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HCI vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HCI
WM
HCI vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HCI vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
HCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than WM's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCI HCI Group, Inc. | 1.01% | 1.37% | 1.83% | 4.04% | 1.92% | 3.06% | 3.50% | 2.90% | 4.68% | 3.04% | 3.44% | 2.54% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
HCI vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCI drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, roughly equal to the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCI and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HCI vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is 5.19%, while Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that HCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HCI vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HCI Group, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities