HBM vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) is a stock, while NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Over the past 10 years, HBM returned 21.26%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for NOBL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBM vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBM achieves a 51.79% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 4.61% return. Over the past 10 years, HBM has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 21.26%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.

HBM

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 34.77%
• YTD: 51.79%
• 6M: 73.76%
• 1Y: 221.75%
• 3Y*: 86.65%
• 5Y*: 31.83%
• 10Y*: 21.26%

NOBL

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 10.44%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBM vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.	51.79%	145.46%	47.03%	9.24%	-29.87%	3.82%	69.50%	-11.77%	-46.20%	54.77%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.61%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HBM and NOBL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013	0.37

The correlation between HBM and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HBM vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBM

HBM Risk / Return Rank: 94
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 25
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBM vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBM	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.96	0.92	+3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	1.42	+2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.16	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.17	1.15	+5.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.77	2.98	+16.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBM vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBM Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBM and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBM	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96	0.92	+3.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.37	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.58	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.65	-0.43

Drawdowns

HBM vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBM drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBM	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.21%	-35.43%	-56.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.16%	-9.11%	-27.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.11%	-15.36%	-25.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.33%	-17.92%	-45.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.34%	-35.43%	-50.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-4.99%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.51%	-3.48%	-49.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.27%	3.51%	+7.76%

Volatility

HBM vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.40%. This indicates that HBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBM	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.49%	2.40%	+17.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.20%	8.05%	+36.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.40%	11.37%	+45.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.03%	14.39%	+40.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.72%	16.60%	+42.12%

Dividends

HBM vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than NOBL's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.	0.05%	0.07%	0.17%	0.31%	0.32%	0.22%	0.21%	0.36%	0.38%	0.23%	0.35%	0.52%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.10%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBM and NOBL in my portfolio?

HBM and NOBL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBM or NOBL?

HBM has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to NOBL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBM dropped -92.21% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.